 |

  |
 |
| |
|
|
| Subject |
I'm w/ Russel on this one. Basic contract law doesnt.. |
 |
| |
|
|
| Posted by |
ForceFedTT (SoCal) on April 01, 2010 at 2:24 PM |
 |
| |
This message has been viewed 92 times. |
 |
| |
|
|
| In Reply To |
Assuming this is about the 370Z brake pads. posted by Russell@Z1 on March 31, 2010 at 11:17 PM |
 |
| |
|
|
| Message |
even protect RedFarce in this case, because it was a mistake in the essential term (price) of which the buyer was aware, which prevents formation for lack of intent to contract (because of a lack of a meeting of the minds). A court, therefore, would reform the contract to the terms intended by both parties, which, in this case, would be a fair price for the brakes, not less than half of the fair price. Pull your head out, RedFarce. You miscalculated in your subject line. Let me fix that for you: RedFarce -1; Z1 +1
 |
 |
| |
|
|
| Follow Ups |
|
|
| |
|
|
Post a Followup |
You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|